The Milwaukee Brewers

I grew up in Wisconsin, so naturally I approached the peak of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs on Wednesday night when the Milwaukee Brewers won their first World Series in the 57 year history of the team in Milwaukee.

In the 1970s my Grandpa would fire up the AM radio, pour himself a Kingsbury beer in a 7oz glass, and keep score of Brewers games in his scorebook while listening to Bob Uecker and Merle Harmon. Yes, there's a retail connection there ... Merle Harmon went on to open 140 sports merchandise stores called "Merle Harmon's Fan Fair". Your local mall likely possessed one of these stores.

Anyway, that's where the passion started. I recall going to a Brewers game in 1976. Bottom of the 9th, trailing, and Henry Aaron was called in to pinch hit. The crowd of maybe 10,000 fans watching a God-awful Brewers team rose to their feet. Aaron hit a fly ball. I instantly screamed out, believing we were about to see a Henry Aaron home run! The ball was caught 100 feet short of the wall, in mid-center field. Game over.

The 1982 team had a 7th inning lead in Game 7 of the World Series and could not pull it off. The State of Wisconsin remembered that team, seemingly forever, through decades of losing.

The Rickie Weeks / Prince Fielder / Ryan Braun / Corey Hart / Jonathan Lucroy teams started to win a bit.

In the past decade, the team starting winning regularly, but developed a nasty habit of horrifying playoff catastrophes. They lost to the Dodgers in 2018 in Game 7 of the NLCS at home. They lost to the Nationals in 2019 (they'd win the title). They lost to the Dodgers in 2020 (they'd win the title). They lost to the Braves in 2021 (they won the title). They lost to the Diamondbacks in 2023 (they won the pennant). They lost to the Mets in horrifying fashion on a 9th inning home run in 2024. They were swept by the Dodgers in the NLCS in 2025.

On Wednesday night, that changed.

The team played as a team, with everybody believing in each other.

Ecommerce isn't terribly different from sports. You work on a team in all likelihood. Some teams are dysfunctional. Some teams have amazing chemistry. Some teams are highly talented. High performers and low performers. Glaring mistakes and amazing creation. Every once-in-awhile your company does something incredible or your team does something incredible. We probably don't talk about this enough, but there are special times at work. You'll remember those times for a long time. You'll remember the people, you'll remember how the people made you feel.

If you find yourself working on a talented and high-performing ecommerce team, enjoy it. It doesn't happen very often.

Quiz Week: Question #4

Yesterday we observed a business where Management decided to discount heavily in an effort to overcome lousy comp segment results. When I'm asked to evaluate businesses for Private Equity, this is a common finding. There are all sorts of tricks Management attempts when trying to make a business appear healthy.

Today, we'll look at annual comp segment results for the past four years. Tell me what is wrong with this business.

Comp Segment Performance:  Existing Items

• 2026 = -11%.
• 2025 = -2%.
• 2024 = +8%.
• 2023 = +12%.

Comp Segment Performance:  New Items

• 2026 = +3%.
• 2025 = -20%.
• 2024 = -24%.
• 2023 = -10%.

Quiz Week: Question #3

Yesterday's business suffered from low merchandise productivity. Customers liked the merchandise less than the year prior. The marketing department continued to spend money finding new/reactivated buyers in an effort to keep the business steady. It's really important for marketing to do what can be done when customers simply don't like the merchandise being offered.

Ok, today we're going to look at two different dimensions within comp segment performance. Can you tell me how Management decided to respond to what was happening within this business?

Comp Segment:  Items Selling At/Above Their Historical Average Price Point.

• Sep:  -27%.
• Aug:  -24%.
• Jul:    -22%.
• Jun:   -12%..
• May:  -17%.
• Apr:   -13%.

Comp Segment:  Items Selling Below Their Historical Average Price Point.

• Sep:  +33%.
• Aug:  +29%.
• Jul:    +25%.
• Jun:   -10%.
• May:  -11%.
• Apr:   -10%.

Quiz Week: Question #2

Yesterday we explored a business where the marketing department elected to cut back on customer acquisition. We can easily detect this issue by looking at comp segment results (which were consistently positive). When comp segment results are positive and new/reactivated comps have a shift in performance at a specific point of time, we look to the marketing team ... because their change in marketing investment caused the business challenge observed.

Here is today's quiz question: What is wrong with this business?

Comp New/Reactivated Buyer Counts:

• Sep:  -3%.
• Aug:  -5%.
• Jul:   +2%.
• Jun:  - 1%.
• May: +3%.
• Apr:  +4%.

Comp Segment (Those With Exactly Two Purchases In The Past Year) Results.

• Sep:  -8%.
• Aug:  -7%.
• Jul:    -9%.
• Jun:   -6%.
• May:  -9%.
• Apr:   -8%.

Quiz Week: Question #1

This week we're going to cover comp segment results that frequently arise in my work. Your job is to diagnose the reason why the business is succeeding or failing.

Question #1:  Here are comp new/reactivated comps, and comp segment results ... for the past six months. What is the likely cause of this business not meeting expectations.

Comp New/Reactivated Buyer Counts:

• Sep:  -22%.
• Aug:  -18%.
• Jul:    -30%.
• Jun:  +13%.
• May: +11%.
• Apr:    +8%.

Comp Segment (Those With Exactly Two Purchases In The Past Year) Results.

• Sep:  +6%.
• Aug:  +8%.
• Jul:    +5%.
• Jun:   +7%.
• May:  +3%.
• Apr:   +9%.

Based on what you see here, what is the reason this business did not meet expectations in recent months? What would cause a business to exhibit the comp new/reactivated buyer and comp segment results you see here? What would you do to fix the problem?

8%

Here's a gem.

I've been working in corporate America for more than thirty-eight years. The number of blank stares I've received when suggesting an A/B test when the person on the other side of the conversation is a ROAS believer ... well, it's a staggering number of blank stares!

A/B tests are humbling. They force you to address your personal marketing belief system. It's been my experience that not many professionals want to address their personal marketing belief system.

60%

In sports, the trend is moving toward building small stadiums. Colorado State comes to mind a few years ago. Northwestern this year, building a 35,000 seat stadium. Instead of probably not selling an inexpensive seat four thousand feet above the field, premium seats with premium experiences are sold at premium prices. Five thousand highly enthusiastic and/or wealthy individuals pay a ton more, the remaining 30,000 pay more.

Similar things are happening in ecommerce. The "middle" of the customer file is simply disappearing, being replaced by either one-time buyers that the brand needs to generate a handsome profit on the acquisition transaction ... or ... loyal buyers are subsidizing the core business.

I've told you this many times ... I define a loyal buyer as somebody who has a 60% or greater chance of buying again in the next year. As we continue to lose all of the "middle" customers to Amazon, the loyal buyer audience becomes increasingly important, because without them there is no profit.

In sports, this audience gets premium experiences, given what they're paying.

In ecommerce?

If I had to make a prediction for the future, I'd predict that "somebody smart" will figure out how to give premium experiences to loyal buyers. Not points. Not discounts. Not BOGOs. Not free shipping. No. Somebody smart is going to figure out what the premium experiences are that are unique to your best customers. Amazon figured it out - you pre-spend just south of $200 a year and somebody delivers the solar yard lights you purchased at 8:58pm tonight by 7:00am the next morning. Oh, the premium experience also includes NFL football games and NBA basketball games and NASCAR and first-run television series and Pickleball TV.

That's what we are competing against.

Have your analytically minded guru score your customer file ... have her tell you how many customers you have that have a 60% or better chance of buying again next year ... have her do this quarterly for the past three years. Have her show you what is happening to your loyal customer base. Is it growing? Is it shrinking? Is it contracting faster than the rest of your twelve-month buyer file?

If your analyst won't perform the work, contact me (kevinh@minethatdata.com) and I'll do it for you. Figure out how many premium customers you have, figure out what you can do for them.

Triggers / Targeting / Personalization

On my last trip to Europe, a vendor was telling a conference attendee how he had a client that was dynamically merchandising a catalog. The client had creative for several hundred products, the client sent the vendor customer purchase transactions, and the vendor assembled a personalized catalog for every customer based on prior purchase transactions. The conference attendee looked at the vendor, and said (I'm paraphrasing here):

• "That takes all the fun out of creating a catalog."

The conference attendee walked away. The vendor sales person look at me and said"

• "I don't understand why almost no catalog professionals realize that we're trying to help them. This happens to us all the time."

Professionals understand that the vendor was trying to help ... and would likely generate more profit.

Maybe you feel this way about your job. Have you ever had a new management team take over your department? A new Vice President? And she doesn't like how you are doing things, so she starts telling you that the way you're doing your job is "wrong" and she prescribes a new way to do things? You feel angry. You believe that she "doesn't get it!" You dig your heels in. You go through the five stages of grief. If you've ever been in this situation, you are reflecting the "that takes all the fun out of creating a catalog" statement above. You are that person!

I've been there.

There are three things that are incongruent with campaign-centric styles of marketing.

• Trigger-based marketing.
• Customer targeting.
• Personalization.

It's one of the reasons some old-school marketers slide into email campaign execution seamlessly. It's a campaign. Everybody gets the same thing. Creation is fun!

It's one of the reasons some old-school marketers slide into social media. It's a campaign. All 199,000 followers get one message, with the added benefit that 25 of the recipients provide feedback. It feels good! Each message is a carefully created campaign.

Meanwhile, AI will usher in an era of machine-oriented triggers / targeting / personalization that will be outside of anybody's control. For many, that's going to take all the fun out of creating. For other professionals, it will be their turn to help run a business.

PostPilot

I don't talk about vendors a whole lot, for good reason. Early in my consulting work I'd be asked to partner with various vendors, the vendors would let my clients down, my clients would stop working with me for recommending a vendor ... you get the picture.

So, I don't have a relationship with anybody at PostPilot (click here). I haven't been asked to say anything about PostPilot.

I will say that a portion of their services are calibrated to helping the catalog brands that still remain.

Print-based marketing is in trouble, and has been for twenty years. Why should you spend $1 sending paper to a customer just because the customer hasn't purchased in 30 months and "might" be a reactivation candidate? Well, the reason you are doing that is because people at your company LOVE creating catalogs. They LOVE the process. They LOVE creatively enticing a customer via a spread. They LOVE the process, regardless of profit.

Profit.

Until the generation of catalog buyers (I'm not talking about the retailers that mail catalogs as branding pieces and don't care about profitability) is no longer employed, the profitability of mailing efforts will continue to erode. This will force those who adore print into a corner (it has been doing this for twenty years).

• To maintain the craft, the catalog-centric professional must focus only on the most productive customers ... the most loyal customers ... or the most recently active customers. These will be the only two viable audiences going forward.

Which brings me back to PostPilot. Now, I get it, you want to merchandise 64 pages, you don't want trigger-based marketing via post cards, that's not what you love doing. The "market" doesn't care what you love doing. The "market" is giving you a small window of opportunity to do something via print.

• Customers who have done "something recently" ... clicked through an email campaign, visited your website, signed up for credit, purchased, interacted with your social media presence ... these customers are profitable via print for a very small period of time. Why wouldn't you capitalize on this small period of time? With print? With the craft you love?

Again, I don't have a relationship with anybody at PostPilot, I haven't been asked to say anything, I just see a small window in the customer relationship process where you could "do something with print" and it "could/should be profitable". I mean, I'd rather leverage email marketing for everything given it costs essentially nothing and a postcard is going to cost at least $0.60, but a portion of my audience loves print, so have at it.

Infrequent Buyers

In about three weeks, a large fraction of your inactive customer file will awaken, briefly. For about 6-7 weeks thereafter, customers who purchase gifts ... customers who like winter-centric merchandise ... they'll awaken after a pummeling of email campaigns over the prior 44 weeks when the gift/winter-centric customer could have cared less.

And then? They'll go quiet again.

In 1999 at Eddie Bauer, our Home customers went dormant as a matter of practice. They bought bedding or pillows or whatever, then their needs were met. We'd waste a fortune mailing catalogs to an audience that was largely dormant. My team got tired of being blamed for low response ... "DON'T YOU KNOW HOW TO TARGET CUSTOMERS??" ... well, yeah, we knew how to target customers, it's just that the customers the company wanted us to target were dormant. So we rented the living daylights out of the Williams Sonoma and Pottery Barn file, and those names worked! Those customers had not just purchased our merchandise.

Obviously it's a different world in 2026. Regardless, you have your product listing ads ready for the dormant customers who are ready to bite. You have a fundamentally different email marketing cadence for the portion of your email subscriber file that is dormant for ten+ months then highly active for 6-7 weeks. Your website recognizes the formerly dormant customer and treats that customer differently.

Take advantage of the tools at your disposal for managing infrequent buyers. This is your time to shine ... it's not a Black Friday / Cyber Monday 60% off opportunity, it's an opportunity to enhance the customer relationship with infrequent customers.

The Long and Winding Road

Your business performance is undoubtedly due to decisions you recently made.

It's also the outcome of decisions made 1-3 years ago.

I worked with a company that threw away winning merchandise ... they just killed a bunch of items, replacing them with stuff that didn't work. Customers acquired 3-5 years ago were loyal to a style of merchandise that they were acquired from. It took this company about thirty months to rebuild the merchandise assortment and ultimately identify new winning items that were aligned with the winning items from 3-5 years ago.

Do you want to know one of the huge benefits of having a 15% or 20% annual rebuy rate? Rebuilding your business is not a long and winding road! You can reinvent your customer base annually! The low-retention businesses I've been aligned with constantly reinvent themselves, they aren't beholden to the past. It's a feature of this business model.

If you are Macy's and you have a customer base with a 60% annual rebuy rate? You can't reinvent anything!! You are truly on a long and winding road, you're not driving the car and your customers own the keys to your car. Any change you make is met with criticism from your long-time loyal customer base. Pundits mock companies like Macy's for not being willing to change or evolve with the times. Pundits are wrong ... companies like Macy's cannot change or evolve with the times or their existing customer base will reject them. They're stuck. It's a huge disadvantage for having a loyal customer base. You're quite honestly better off creating new brands than trying to reinvent the existing brand, your loyal customers won't let you reinvent the existing brand.

Both the low-rebuy ecommerce brand and the loyalty-centric retail brand need to develop new items that become winning items. This part of business is universal, and it's a lot of fun for the marketer/analyst who decides to help grow the business via great items.

Newness

I watched some of the US-Spain Women's Soccer match Tuesday night.

So many players I didn't recognize. The ones I recognized largely won the Olympics a few years ago. The great class from 2015-2019, the players who struggled in the 2023 World Cup, they're gone. Times change, and if future players aren't identified and developed, future performance suffers.

Have you watched the Kansas City Chiefs play football this year? Patrick Mahomes is running the show, but look at his supporting cast ... it's a new generation of players, isn't it?

You know all about this dynamic, don't you?

If you don't find new customers, future performance suffers.

If you don't develop new items into winning items, future performance suffers.

In many ways, if you don't explore new marketing channels, future performance suffers. It's one of the blind spots of modern ecommerce professionals ... pursuit of marketplaces resulted in dead ends and missed opportunities elsewhere. Yes, some of you with commodity products are actually better-served selling on Amazon than on your own platform. Those of you who spent the past twenty years building viable "brands" have better opportunities to pursue.

Ecommerce is an endless exploration of "newness". If you are an analytically-focused professional, there's an entire career that can be built from the blueprint of newness + winners (winning items, winning customers).

A CEO Who's Customer Retention Heart Had Hardened

Back in the days when somebody paid to put you on an airplane (i.e. pre-video-conference days), I was asked by a CEO to visit his company to address a comment I made in a project writeup.

The comment?

"Until 'brand x' realizes they only retain 33% of last year's buyer file and invests significantly in customer acquisition efforts, 'brand x" will continue to contract."

At this time I had worked with the brand for more than seven years.

I was asked to present my findings to several operational teams within the company. At the end of the day, the Executive Team gathered with the CEO. It was my job to explain my findings to the CEO.

The CEO did not like my message. He took umbrage with my comment that his brand would contract. He began to yell. His face reddened. He eventually slammed his fist on the table hard enough to cause tendon damage, telling me that I didn't understand business, that his team would crack the code for customer loyalty.

At this time, his annual rebuy rates had already declined by about five percentage points (i.e. from 45% to 40%) over a seven-year period of time. I decided to chime in. My comment would end our business relationship. Here's what I said.

• "You've already had seven years as CEO to crack the loyalty code. Instead, your rebuy rates have contracted over your tenure. What makes you think you the next seven years will be different?"

With that, I lost a lot of $$$, because this client was very good to me.

Would you want an analytics consultant to tell you the truth?

Or do you want an analytics consultant to make you feel good?

This CEO wanted the latter.

The problem, by the way, was not fixed. Even after a new Management Team took over.

You do not solve customer retention problems. I have a client who does an amazing job of getting as close as you can to solving customer retention problems. They've figured out the fusion of merchandising strategy and marketing targeting solutions. You CAN make a difference. You CAN'T solve the problem.

Your ability to retain your customer base is largely constrained by the merchandise you sell. If you sell stuff that doesn't sell well in summer, why would you retain customers in summer? And if you cannot retain customers in summer, why would your retention rate be high?

The business I'm talking about here had a season when the majority of their sales happened ... the customer simply didn't need their products or services year-round. By default, their business was calibrated to NOT retain customers each year.

Most of your businesses are calibrated to NOT retain customers. That's business - you succeed for other reasons!!!  You know this to be true if your average number of annual purchases per twelve-month buyer is under 2.0. Somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 purchases per year is the spot where retention sings and loyalty becomes apparent.

No amount of fist-slamming fixes a retention problem. Only year-round appealing merchandise does that.

Your November / December Forecast

Let's try something ... contact me (kevinh@minethatdata.com) and for a nominal fee I'll produce a forecast for three timeframes, based on how your customer file looks as of today. I mean, it is Forecast Season!

• Timeframe #1 = November before the day before Thanksgiving.
• Timeframe #2 = Cyber Window ... day before Thanksgiving to the Saturday after Cyber Monday.
• Timeframe #3 = Sunday after Cyber Monday - December 31.

If you have a customer file problem, I'll be able to expose it for you quickly (project turnaround would be in just a few days), allowing you to change your marketing investments to help meet your business goals during November / December.

Contact me now (kevinh@minethatdata.com) and I'll turn this one around for you quickly at a cost that you can literally Venmo me the funds.

The Hated Holiday

There's just nothing in ecommerce more rudimentary, nothing that shows your service provider doesn't truly understand business ... than the promotion of Cyber Monday.

Or worse, "BFCM" as the service provider industry calls it.

Yesterday I talked about "double dipping" ... the proven method of acquiring / converting customers in September / October so they are recent and active in November / December, thereby "double dipping" ... generating two orders in a short period of time.

What makes more sense to you?

• Acquire a customer or activate a customer in Sep/Oct and then get another quick purchase in Nov/Dec?
• Generate an order at 50% off and then the customer doesn't spend money on full priced merchandise the rest of the year while waiting for "BFCM" again? It's good business for service providers. It's not good business for you. Why give away all that gross margin to participate in a service provider holiday?

Have you ever asked yourself why Amazon might benefit from Prime Days in the first week of October? It's almost like they're trying to get customers to double-dip!

Double-Dip Season

As you likely know, in most cases you WANT to acquire a new customer in September or October.

Why?

You get to double-dip. 

When you acquire a customer on December 13, the customer is "done". The customer might purchase clearance products in January and might buy again in Spring (but probably won't buy again in Spring). From there, the customer largely goes dormant until the following November/December.

When you acquire a customer on October 13, the customer is "not done". When the customer is most likely to buy for a second time (the first ten weeks after a first purchase), you present the customer with November / December ... two months of amplified response. The customer quickly becomes a 2x buyer, and from there the customer is on the path to loyalty.

One of the easiest ways to build a loyal customer base is to acquire customers in Sep/Oct then send trigger-based email campaigns to customers through December to rapidly generate a second order. Many companies do this, it's highly effective, and it's highly profitable.

So go do it!!

Working With A Great Partner

When I worked at Eddie Bauer, I was part of what was called the "Catalog Business Team" ... CBT. It was our job to execute the catalog and ecommerce marketing, merchandising, inventory, creative, and operational team plans. Not being Lemonheads, we took our mandate further. We acted like we owned the catalog/ecommerce division, for good reason of course, because if we messed up, we were fired. Best to be fired setting the tone rather than following marching orders.

I was responsible for catalog marketing and analytics. My inventory partner was the best. We made the company a ton of money by working together, partnering on what our business / sales plan would be long before anybody else paid attention. By doing that, we had a solid plan when the Executives chose to pay attention. They nibbled around the edges of the plan, but the plan was truly our plan.

The most profit the catalog/ecommerce channel ever generated happened on our watch.

We partnered on dictating the merchandise assortment we'd feature in catalog and online. Back then the catalog drove everything, today it would be quite a different story. Let's pretend that last year's October catalog had the following composition.

• 24 pages of mens existing merch.
• 24 pages of mens new merch.
• 36 pages of womens existing merch.
• 36 pages of womens new merch.
• 8 pages of home.
• 8 pages of womens tailored merch.
• 136 pages total.

I would determine how many pages we could profitably mail next year, based on last year's productivity. Let's say I could only author 120 pages. My partner would go back and optimize performance of each category above based on last year's productivity, yielding a plan that might look like this.

• 16 pages of mens existing merch.
• 20 pages of mens new merch.
• 40 pages of womens existing merch.
• 36 pages of womens new merch.
• 4 pages of home.
• 4 pages of womens tailored merch.
• 120 pages total.

From here, I'd calculate the expected productivity of the pages. Fewer pages means less sales but better productivity. I'd calculate "merchandise productivity" ... showing that my partner's optimization resulted in each page being 10% more productive. Sales would decrease, but each page was more profitable. This allowed me to circulate deeper, converting more customers.

• Last Year:  3,000,000 catalogs at 136 pages, sales = $20,000,000. Demand per Thousand Pages Circulated = $49.02.
• Next Year:  3,500,000 catalogs at 120 pages, sales = $22,320,000. Demand per Thousand Pages Circulated = $53.14.
• Demand/Sales would be +12%, ad costs would be +3%, profit would increase by $700,000.

We replicated this for every catalog we'd mail, we'd adjust merchandise productivity and give direction to the nascent ecommerce team, our plan would fold into plans for the call center, the distribution center, for inventory buys, and it would give direction to our merchants and creative team.

There were two teams that generally argued with the plan.

1. The merchandising team.
2. The creative team.

The merchandising team did not like constraints ... constraints like "16 pages of mens existing merchandise". They wanted 32 pages. My partner and I would run the scenarios for everybody, showing how much sales/profit we'd give up adhering to their direction. To some extent this happens at every company, but disciplined companies push back when the merchants want "more".

The creative team did not like constraints. They wanted eight pages for "branding". No selling. We'd explain that was like flushing $80,000 of profit down the toilet. We'd ask the creative folks if they wanted to explain their ideas to the CEO. They didn't want to explain their ideas to the CEO.

There's nothing that destroys the profitability of an old-school catalog division like a creative director who wants to explore "branding".

But when you have a great business partner ... and the two of you work in lock-step ... you can achieve record profit.

Within a year I'd leave to work in the dot-com world (what ultimately became the 'retargeting' industry), watched my stock options go from 78 13/16 to 1, then accepted a job at Nordstrom, where I again had great partners (the merchant/creative person and the inventory person were both very good).

There are few things in business more enjoyable than working with great partners who have facts and work in lock-step with you to achieve great things ... and then great things happen.

Life of an Item

In case you are wondering why I'm talking about items / merchandise more often, this is a process that happens every 3-5 years. Business doesn't go the way we want it to, we focus on merchandise for awhile (which often fixes the problem), then we get away from merch and focus on marketing channels until marketing channels don't work great (usually caused by merchandise problems) ... and we repeat the cycle.

We're always repeating the cycle.

Sometimes our merchandise assortment gets stale. It happens to every company. It's during the "stale periods" when we dig a bit deeper.

Let's pretend you measure how much items sell by year ... let's pretend you've analyzed the dynamic for items you've offered for at least four years. You see the following.

• Intro Stub Year = $50,000 per item.
• First Full Year = $75,000.
• Second Full Year = $38,000.
• Third Full Year = $19,000.
• Fourth Full Year = $9,500.

The item essentially generates $191,000 over the stub year and first four years. You don't have unlimited warehousing space, so when an item dips below, say, $15,000, you discontinue the item and find something new. This means the life of the item is the stub year plus three full years.

Once you have a framework, you can identify the items in your assortment that are at the end of their life. You can communicate with your merchants that your customers need newness.

This is the point in the discussion where somebody will raise their hand and offer me advice:

• "I work in marketing, and I shouldn't have to deal with merchandise performance, that's why we have merchants. I should be allowed to focus on marketing."

Oh my little grasshopper.

Have you ever noticed that when business is off by 5% the Finance Team and the Merchant Team start asking questions about marketing? I notice it. It happens. All the time. It's happened for the thirty-six years I've been in this business. Marketers are constantly being fired for merchandising sins.

Checks and balances are important. You do not want to be held accountable because your merchandising partners held on to old products too long. Measure the life of an item, and focus on communication when you notice that products are aging, potentially harming customer response.

Assortment Age

If you want to understand if your customers are being impacted by your merchandise assortment, you can run my comp segment metrics (obviously) - you can run my Class Of Reporting (duh).

You can also measure what I call "Assortment Age".

Take every item a customer purchased in September, and for those items calculate the number of months that item has been available to be sold. If it were introduced fifteen months ago, the age of that item is 15 months. Perform this for every item you sell.

Compare September 2026 to September 2025, to September 2024. What is the average age of the assortment the customer purchased?

You might see something like this:

• 2026 = 13.2 Months.
• 2025 = 18.1 Month.
• 2024 = 13.6 Months.

The 2025 metric should set off all sorts of alarm bells.

There are a thousand reasons why an assortment ages or is immature. It's nearly impossible to balance the metric perfectly, teeter-totter style. Sometimes your assortment needs to be rebuilt and the assortment will be artificially "young".

If you have a month where results aren't ideal, go look at your merchandise assortment, calculate Assortment Age, and see what it tells you.

Email Messaging to Non-Fans

One of the challenges of ecommerce-in-a-box is that you work so hard to piece together a credible vendor solution (i.e. Shopify) that you don't stop to ask yourself how the customer sees the experience.

Example?

Friday Pickleball.

I was on the ground floor, watching their funny videos years ago.

I've spoken with the guys at a pickleball tournament. If you've never been to a PPA Tournament in Mesa (or elsewhere), by all means, open up your wallet and enjoy. You might see the guys there.

My wife paid $ to be coached by Kyle Koszuta. I've forwarded his videos to my audience at Pickleball Mathlete. We've watched him battle the pros in early rounds on Pickleball.TV. We've enjoyed watching Rachel Rohrabacher battle the best in the business, using their paddles as their first signed pro.

We took their Pickleball Personality Test.

We watched those guys as they changed their lives, moving to Phoenix to grow their careers.

Last week, I needed a new paddle ... I bought the Friday Aura to help protect my arm from tennis elbow.

You'd likely say I'm a "fan".

Their ecommerce-in-a-box solution doesn't know that. They've sent me two ecommerce-related messages since.

1. Please Become An Affiliate Marketer For Them.
2. The Message Below.

I just bought a paddle, and NOW you're going to tell me you'll help me find the right paddle?

Mind you, this doesn't change anything because I'm a fan. I'm with them.

The message is for you, it's illustrative for your business. The vast majority of your customers are not fans. Nope. Those who aren't fans don't want a "customer relationship". They want you to fulfill a want/need they have at a point-in-time. Telling them you can solve a problem hours after they purchase thinking they've already solved the problem is counter-productive. It's especially counter-productive because you are a small/scrappy brand using Shopify / Klaviyo so you can compete/beat somebody like Macy's ... only to have ecommerce-in-a-box fail you.

Again, I love what the Friday Pickleball folks are doing overall - I'm a fan, so I'm not going anywhere. Most of your customers are not fans, so the rules for those customers are different. Your messaging should reflect that fact, it needs to be more "on point" if you will.

Rocktober

Growing up, we had a Classic Rock station (it wasn't really "classic" yet, but you get the drift) that adored the month of October. They called October "Rocktober". Combine that with "Two for Tuesday" and you really had something ... the dulcet tones of the band Rainbow singing "Stone Cold" and "All Night Long".

I thought about stopping the post right there, but that wouldn't be fair to you, the loyal reader.

Every one of you has a marketing channel that is dying. Sort of like FM Radio is dying. My favorite station in the Pacific Northwest was KRXY ("Roxy") 94.5 from Shelton. You'd hear Rainbow's "Stone Cold" followed by "Cherish" by Madonna followed by "Loser" by Beck and then they'd wrap it up with something from Arianna Grande. Just random Rock/Pop nonsense.

There was nothing like it.

And then?

Spotify playlists.

On June 30, KRXY didn't sell to some soulless entity and become part of the "iHeart Radio Family". They just shut down. Over. Fin. Bankrupt. Their scraps were ultimately acquired by another local station.

Every one of you has a marketing channel that is dying. For some of you, you don't have the metrics to realize that the marketing channel is dying. You keep paying Facebook and they keep sending you customers eight years older than your average customer and you think things are fine. They're not fine. One of the signs of a dying marketing channel is that the customers delivered by the marketing channel are disproportionately older than the age of customers from other marketing channels. Catalogers know this all too well ... they ran their businesses into the ground trusting co-op marketing channels who delivered 74 year old customers instead of the 47 year old customers they needed.

Identify the average age of all customers acquired in the past year by marketing channel. Yeah yeah, I know, marketing attribution double-counting blah blah blah. Do the work anyway. If the nascent new customer from ChatGPT is 33 years old, the Google Search customer is 43 years old, and the paid social customer from Facebook is 58 years old, you have a pretty good idea which marketing channel is going to become KRXY.

Warning Sign: Prices Up, Customers Correspondingly Down

When you increase prices (typically by discontinuing a product line and introducing a new/comparable line at a higher price), there are several things that can happen.

1. Nothing. This is the hope. You essentially increase prices and customers don't care. It's the kind of thing Apple gets away with.
2. Fewer Items per Order. This is the most common outcome. Prices increase from $20 to $25, customers in-kind decrease items per order from 2.5 to 2.0. Nothing has been accomplished with the notable exception of fewer items going through your distribution center. 
3. Fewer Orders per Buyer:  Happens less frequently than (2) above but it still happens. Some of your existing customers just say "no". AOV hawks will quickly point out that there's nothing wrong with AOV, and they're right, AOV often increases in these circumstances. And yet? Business is just "off" a few percentage points ... because customers are not buying as often.
4. Lower Repurchase Rate:  Sort of a byproduct of Fewer Orders per Buyer, but more significant because some customers just say "no mas" and go find something cheaper on Amazon. Once you start trading in the dark arts of lower repurchase rates, all sorts of lousy outcomes transpire. Your buyer file decreases, you have to "make budget" so you acquire more new customers at ever-more-expensive rates to make up the difference harming the p&l in the process. This is a common scenario.
5. Fewer New/Reactivated Buyers: The counterpart to (4) above. (4) is a measure of what your existing customers think, (5) is a measure of what "the market" thinks about your pricing. It is common to see a disconnect here ... stable repurchase rates among existing buyers but a 20% drop in new/reactivated buyers. If your annual rebuy rate is 30%, the market dictates what you do. If your annual rebuy rate is 70%, you dictate what you do.

(4) and (5) result in declining customer counts. Review your prices post-COVID and correlate average price per item purchased with rebuy rates and with new/reactivated buyers.

Does the analysis reflect any warning signs?

Signaling The Warning Signs

Here's lawyer-esque boilerplate commentary from Gap's 10K report for 2025, page 38.

A credit rating of BB+ isn't great.

For you and I, interest rates are going up.

And if you really want to terrify yourself, listen to this podcast (click here) and learn what happens when the AI bubble pops. Assuming the hosts are correct, which is an assumption.

You can slide on down to page 45 in the 10K document. Sales up two percent. Store sales +1%, Ecommerce sales +4%. A +2 comp in an inflationary environment isn't really a +2 comp, as you all know. Gross margin was down from 41.3% to 40.8%. Inventory was +7% (oh oh).

If this phrase for fixing the business doesn't signal a warning sign, I don't know what does. Again, from page 45.

• "... optimizing our platform to drive scale by advancing capabilities that amplify and enable our brands."

3% of stores have been closed over the past two years.

Free cash flow is down nearly 20% vs. a year prior.

Now, you're probably saying to yourself, "Kevin, that's the 2025 annual report. They're halfway or more into 2026". You are correct.

Q2 2026:

Net Sales -2%.

Gross Profit +$390 million due to a recovery of $417 million in tariffs, otherwise down $27 million.

You're probably paying attention to your metrics as well. Get your business as healthy as you can. It's possible you'll experience chaos after the election, followed by the unwinding of the AI bubble over the next two years. Or not. I'd want to be prepared.

Reassessing

There's been all sorts of calamities, some caused by external issues, some self-inflicted.

I recall 1995, 1998, years where the companies I was with caused their own problems.

2001 - a hybrid of the end of the dotcom era and self-inflicted damage.

2007 - when you could feel that customers spent all their "free" money from their homes, there wasn't anything left to spend (as we'd soon find out).

2012 - the collapse of the omnichannel movement begins (accelerating into 2016/2017).

2021 (Fall) - the popping of the COVID bump.

The data I'm seeing these days is mixed, with some able to thrive, others battling external issues and internal mistakes.

When business signals are mixed, reassess your marketing spend, reassess your new item development plan. Run your Class Of Report (I'll do it for you if you don't have the resources to do it), and make sure you aren't -20% on demand from new items this year (which will cost you money on existing items next year) or -20% on existing items this year (meaning you discontinued stuff you shouldn't have).

Can You Believe It? It's Time, Again

Four months go by in the snap of a finger!

It's time for yet another run of the MineThatData Elite Program. Cost is $1,800 for first-time participants, $1,000 for those who previously participated. You receive the standard suite of metrics I run (rolling twelve-month analysis, comp segment, comp new/reactivated buyers, repurchase behavior, new/reactivated buyer trends, next twelve-month forecast). Very little cost, plenty of insights into where your business is headed.

Contact me now (kevinh@minethatdata.com) and let's get started.

• Data Due by 10/15/2026.
• Payment Due by 10/15/2026.
• Analysis Delivered by 10/31/2026.

Ways To Grow

Let's assume you aren't a retail brand looking to add stores. Your growth options are actually quite limited.

You can find new customers. This is necessary, and it is not generally prioritized.

You can get existing customers to spend more. This is hard, it is almost always prioritized, and is often a waste of resources.

You can add product lines and/or create new brands. Non-competing product lines are one of the best ways to grow. If you sell Women's Apparel and you move into Kids, guess what? You'll sell more merchandise. If you sell Women's Apparel and you move into Widgets? That's a lot harder.

You can move into other channels. It's the reason many of you sell on Amazon. They do the hard work, they take a chunk of your profit in kind.

As it becomes harder to find new customers, it becomes necessary to explore new product lines and/or new brands.

What Does The Plan Look Like When Proper Organic Percentages Are Applied?

If I have to hear one more professional lament the fact that Orvis doesn't mail catalogs anymore but Amazon does ... then suggesting that "Amazon is smarter" ... my goodness.

None of that matters. The only thing that matters is your customers, your marketing efforts, and the incremental effectiveness of your marketing efforts. That's it.

Here's what proper application of the "Organic Percentage" looks like. Below is a typical circulation plan (simplified by deciles instead of segments for illustrative purposes) via matchback analytics. Looks good on the surface (only look at the top portion of the table for now).

Every segment is profitable - you could absorb a 10% increase in ad costs and still be profitable. It's all good! Catalogs work.

Except they don't work for most customers.

You're one of the smart ones ... you execute mail/holdout tests. For you, 75% of the demand will happen anyway, 25% is "caused" by catalog marketing. Which leaves you with the bottom half of the table.

Look at that. There are ten deciles/segments there. How many are profitable? One (1). One!! Just the most loyal customers. Every other segment represents a marketing abomination.

In case you are wondering, this is where the arguments begin.

There is the group of professionals who simply do not believe the results. They are true believers in the craft. You cannot convince this audience of anything, even though 80% of the catalog pages circulated 20 years ago no longer exist (because they were terribly ineffective). You have to let these people marinate in their delusion.

There is a group of professionals who have to test 50 times ... they believe that the test results "are not representative". These people are stalling. They know the change that these results will lead to, and they don't want to deal with change. So they delay the inevitable.

There are a small group of professionals who believe the results, but realize their organization is unwilling to change. This audience largely left catalog marketing in the past twenty years, and are now thriving in ecommerce.

There are a small group of professionals who work in paper / printing / agencies. They CANNOT believe these results, because as I was told by a paper rep ... "it will take food off my dinner table, and I cannot allow that to happen". They lie to benefit their craft. They are not fundamentally different than politicians who lie to protect their congressional seat.

There are a small group of professionals who work at agencies AND they believe in the results and they try to do what is best for their clients. If the agency you work with is willing to execute mail/holdout tests and evaluate results via the bottom half of the table (above), hold on to that agency like your life depends upon it.

Then there are the companies who change. Like Nordstrom did back in 2005 when I worked there (they kept mailing branding-centric catalogs throughout, but the classic list-based catalog business model was discountinued). Like Orvis. Like several of my clients. Why are they changing? Because they run a p&l that looks like this.

These companies make a choice. They take the 17% demand hit, but save $360,000 in ad cost and increase profit by $213,000 (in this example). With the ad cost savings, they typically reinvest in digital marketing channels ... or they just become a smaller brand that is more profitable. Either way, they outperform those who don't evaluate their businesses in this manner.

Did you see what happened in the bottom half of the table, when you evaluate your circulation plan via mail/holdout tests?

• Only the most loyal customers are profitable.

This is why you'll see brands with the GDP of Australia be able to mail catalogs ... they have hyper-loyal customers that can afford to be mailed even if little of the demand generated by the catalog is actually incremental.

This is why I argue that catalog marketing will still be a craft that can be applied to loyal customers or hyper-productive customers. The math will continue to work for a period of time.

But for everybody else?

• It's over.
• It's been over for a long time.
• There's no reason to badger Orvis because they made what is in reality an easy, fact-based, profitable decision.

It's Forecast Season!

Somebody at your company sounded the alarm bells about November/December.

Is that person right? Are you going to be below plan/budget? Or is the professional paranoid?

It helps to have facts, doesn't it?

As I generally do each year, I'll accept five years of data through September 30. With that data, I'll tell you what your projections for November/December look like. It's Forecast Season!

Contact me right now (kevinh@minethatdata.com) and I'll project November/December for you at a low cost.

Content Creation

Here's the link.

I realize many of you are stymied by creating content for your customers. Some of you would say the video above is pointless, useless, and may have nominal ROI if any. Think of this as a triangle, with being "stymied" on one point, "pointless" on another, and doing something on the third point of the triangle.

How Will You Give New Items Exposure?

It's hard for the customer to know you have new merchandise unless you tell them you have new merchandise. You do that through print (for some of you), you do that through email marketing, you do that through your home page, you do that via social media.

Now think a bit about the evolution of search. Your search-centric customers already skew to existing items ... just perform the analysis yourself, it's easy to do and it is revealing as heck. Algorithms push customers to items that algorithms know about.

AI likes/needs to be "trained". How do you train an algorithm on an item that you won't offer yet for two more months?

Email marketing is going to become your most important new merchandise advertising platform. It will be one of the few places you have control over the message. Start your experiments today, learn as much as you can, and be ready for the change that is coming.

The Organic Percentage Over Time

When I left Lands' End in 1995, one of the challenges the analytically-focused person faced was the fact that some in Management did not believe that if you didn't mail a catalog 30% of the demand would still happen (from surrounding catalogs). This "fact" (measured via mail/holdout tests) meant that what was marginally profitable was, in fact, unprofitable. Nobody wants to be tied to something that is unprofitable. Consequently, facts were not accepted.

At the time I thought "these people just aren't smart enough to understand simple math". I was wrong. People are smart enough to understand facts, be it in marketing or politics. People choose to ignore facts for perfectly good reasons.

The organic percentage, at 30% in 1996, would become larger, creating ever-bigger problems.

By decade, the organic percentage grew.

• 1996:  30%.
• 2006:  50%.
• 2016:  65%.
• 2026:  80%.

In 2026, the only customers that can be profitably mailed are good or great customers. That's it.

And I get it ... some of you are reading this and you go back to your matchback analytics and you say "I'm good". You run a p&l on each segment and you believe you are mailing 36 month customers profitably. If you believe this, execute the following experiment.

• Assume your organic percentage isn't 80%, assume it is just 50%. Pretend like it is 2006.
• Run a p&l for each segment assuming your organic percentage is an old-school 50%.
• What does the analysis tell you?

It tells you an inconvenient truth.

• If you do what the analysis says, your company will be more profitable. Much more profitable.
• If you do what the analysis says, you will cost your company top-line sales/revenue/demand, and you have forces within your company who will never let you do that.

This is why so many catalog brands ultimately went bankrupt. They couldn't let the top-line contract, so they just kept doing what they were doing until unprofitable became "too unprofitable" while customer response also contracted.

When the AI bubble pops (and it most assuredly will pop), new ecommerce models fueled by what AI is supposed to become will emerge. Print will be forced to be leveraged only by brands with the GDP of Bolivia or will be a tactic to leverage with best customers with high iROAS. It will not be a channel to center an entire business around (and honestly, it hasn't been for 20 years). Also - the same forces that came for catalog marketing will come for old-school ecommerce in a few years. It's how capitalism works.

An Interesting Evaluation Of Marketing Effectiveness

A link was offered to download a "white paper" demonstrating that print has fabulous ROI.

The "good" from the PostPilot report?

• S-Tier Analysis:  Conducted via mail/holdout groups. Yeah, they went there. Kudos!
• They Didn't Lie:  Their results "make sense". They aligned with reality.

The "not so good" that made me #sigh?

• Results derived from highly responsive customers.

You can cover a whole bunch of sins by executing marketing against the most responsive customers. Just ask the loyalty industry for verification. Here is an example of the kind of direction they're leading you in.

There is nothing nefarious happening here - the analysis is measured properly, the organic percentage is common/reasonable, and iROAS (incremental demand / ad spend) is incremental.

Is there a flaw in the analysis?

No.

Is the analysis misleading?

Yes.

Why?

The analysis was executed against highly responsive customers ... ones about to buy or ones who just purchased. In either case, the customer is not representative of the customer base. EVERY marketing effort "is likely" to work when measured against highly responsive customers. Including print. Especially print!

The logic falls apart when you take the same conditions and apply them to, say, a customer who has not purchased in 18 months.

Everything is the same here - same incremental lift, same ad cost, same organic percentage. However, the customer is simply not responsive. As a consequence, the marketing channel is not effective, with a horrifying iROAS and a loss.

That's how you make something appear to be effective - execute it against responsive customers.

But when you try to extend the audience? Not so good.

Email and Social are the ways you speak with non-responsive audiences. Ad costs are so minimal that the numbers work.

You Get This Newsletter Every Saturday, Right?

If you want to see what a mix of professionalism, free information, and personal expression looks like, get on this email subscription (I've been here for more than a decade, long enough to see his kids grow up and move into college and begin careers).

Saturday's email was about the resurgence of brand marketing ... which is interesting because on many recent video conferences there have been robust discussions about the death of catalog marketing and the importance of email marketing as one of the few ways to have an actual "relationship" with a customer.