Dear Catalog CEOs:
A carefully crafted loyalty program can increase sales by somewhere around 10%, among customers who are deemed loyal.
And yet, for most of us, loyalty programs don't work.
At Nordstrom, good customers had an 85% chance of buying again in the next year, purchasing maybe ten times if the customer repurchases. That's 0.85*10 = 8.5 expected annual orders per loyal customer. If a loyalty program increases volume by 10%, then you achieve an incremental 8.5 * 0.10 = 0.85 orders per customer.
At your garden-variety catalog brand, good customers have a 45% chance of buying again in the next year, purchasing maybe two times if the customer repurchases. That's 0.45*2 = 0.9 expected annual orders per loyal customer. If a loyalty program increases volume by 10%, then you achieve an incremental 0.9 * 0.10 = 0.09 orders per customer.
Can you see the difference between the two business models?
It doesn't matter what the cataloger does ... a loyalty program is going to make no difference whatsoever.
It make all the difference in the world what Nordstrom does ... a loyalty program greatly increases sales and generates profit.
Trade journalists, bloggers, and many loyalty experts miss this subtlety in customer behavior.
Loyalty programs work in a high-frequency environment.
Loyalty programs cannot force infrequent buyers into frequent buying behavior.
Eleven years ago I spoke at NEMOA about the importance of Judy / Jennifer / Jasmine as key shoppers within a traditional catalog brand (hint...
It is time to find a few smart individuals in the world of e-mail analytics and data mining! And honestly, what follows is a dataset that y...
As is my tradition, I'm going to take a long weekend. No posts until early next week. I've been doing this for almost twenty years, ...
Sometimes you think "people already know this stuff". Sometimes you realize that Google Analytics give smart analysts almost no op...