Now, please take this infographic with a grain of salt ... there's a lot of theory and unsubstantiated numerical wizardry going on here ... click here for the article/chart.
The point isn't to argue or defend the chart ... the point is to get us to think about low-cost customer acquisition.
As catalogers, we cling to high-cost customer acquisition. We love to pay co-ops and Google money for new customers. It's easy. It's predictable. It scales ... we can hire one person to acquire new customers via co-ops and search ... one person!
A lot of what we're going to be asked to do in the future is like the old-school, two-step programs. Remember those? We'd advertise with a blow-in, allowing the customer to request a catalog ... this request got the customer on our customer file, where we'd market to the customer in the future.
Our future includes a lot of "two-step" activity ... using social/mobile as a "prospect list", eventually converting prospects into buyers, with luck. At first, this won't appear to "scale", it will seem like a lot of work for very little payback.
It sure seems like we're headed in that direction though, doesn't it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hillstrom's Targeting: Value of Primary / Secondary / Tertiary
Ok, let's look at a practical example of Primary / Secondary / Tertiary categorization of merchandise categories. In this case, we ...
-
Look at the first four rows of our life table (values of 0/1/2/3). These are the first 12-15 weeks after a customer buys for the firs... -
We spent the past two weeks talking about the events and influences that shaped what I call "The Great Eight". My Influence... -
If you don't like geeky math, please skip this post, because I am about to show you how the sausage is made! I have eight variables in...
Superb, brilliant weblog structure! I like your blog post Low-Cost Customer Acquisition and method of writing,
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete