Dear Catalog CEOs:
And then the internet came along.
Today, catalog frequency and page counts are a highly sensitive topic.
I can't tell you how many meetings I've been in during the past four years, where the discussion goes something like this:
Merchant: "The catalog is 144 pages, and I only have 24 pages to show my product. I need 36 pages. Please add 12 pages, make the catalog 156 pages. Thank you."
Kevin: "The catalog will be less profitable at 156 pages. In fact, the catalog shouldn't even be 144 pages, it should be 64 pages with call-outs to key landing pages."
Merchants: "You can't sell product unless you show the customer the product. I need an additional 12 pages. Please add the pages to the assortment. Thanks."
Kevin: "What about e-mail?"
Merchant: "What about e-mail?"
Kevin: "Why don't you feature your products in e-mail campaigns. Your e-mail campaigns go to over a million subscribers, three times a week."
Merchant: "Real customers use catalogs, hardly anybody shops from e-mail campaigns. Our catalogs generate $3.00 per book, we're luck to get $0.15 per e-mail, and that only happens when we offer 20% off and free shipping."
Kevin: "What about your website? Only 4.8% of your customers convert when they visit the website. Why don't you spend time getting that rate up to 6.0% for your customers, you'll increase demand by twenty-five percent."
Merchant: "Our IT team won't let us touch the website."
Kevin: "What about search? Why not partner with your vendor to maximize the search performance of your division?"
Merchant: "Is that where we have to do all of that fancy bidding? I don't even know what that's all about. Just let me add the pages to the catalog."
Kevin: "What about social media? Have you built a deep, emotional connection with your fans?"
Merchant: "Do you know how much work that requires? And at the end of the day, I have fans, but I don't necessarily have sales. Just let me add the pages to the catalog."
Eventually, the merchant beats people down, getting his/her way ... sales increase, profit decreases, page counts increase, circulation depth decreases, prospecting decreases, the customer file erodes, and the business slowly sinks into a murky pool of warm tar.
In the post-internet era, page counts are death.
Here's a typical relationship, one that I see over and over and over again:
Pages | Demand | Profit |
0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
12 | 1.46 | 0.48 |
24 | 1.89 | 0.56 |
36 | 2.19 | 0.60 |
48 | 2.44 | 0.61 |
60 | 2.65 | 0.62 |
72 | 2.83 | 0.61 |
84 | 3.00 | 0.59 |
96 | 3.15 | 0.57 |
108 | 3.29 | 0.55 |
120 | 3.42 | 0.52 |
132 | 3.55 | 0.49 |
144 | 3.66 | 0.46 |
156 | 3.77 | 0.42 |
168 | 3.88 | 0.38 |
180 | 3.98 | 0.34 |
As pages increase, demand increases at a ever-decreasing rate, yielding less and less incremental profit. The problem, of course, is that the Circulation Manager sees 132 pages and $0.49 of profit and says, "yup, that works!"
It doesn't work. It's simply wasteful. These days, 3+3=4. It's a relationship that subtly destroys the profitability of a catalog business in the internet era.
Testing indicates that the future of catalog marketing is all about small catalogs with a highly targeted assortment to a rural, older audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.