Should an entry-level employee earn a bonus that is based on company performance?
In my formative years at Lands' End, entry-level employees earned a bonus based on company performance. As a statistical modeler, I did have an impact on the company. If I built a model that improved sales by 1%, that resulted in $7.5 million in demand, maybe $2.5 million in EBIT. So the bonus was important to me. I eagerly watched our financial results. I learned how my work contributed to the success of the company.
Maybe more important, I felt valued at Christmas when I received half my bonus check, and again in March when I received the other half. I still felt valued when the bonus check was tiny.
I've experienced the opposite effect.
I once led a group of individuals in a division of a company that offered bonuses. This division merged with another division. The other division did not offer bonuses. As a result, the combined division would not offer bonuses.
Take an employee who earned a salary of $40,000 per year, with a bonus range of between 6% and 15% (not the actual percentages used at this company). The bonus could vary between $0, and $6,000.
In this case, the employees earned 15% bonuses each of the past two years. Their division performed well above expectations, they deserved to share in the success.
The decision makers did not have the courage to tell the employees of this decision. My directors and I had to communicate this message to my employees.
I recall being in an Executive meeting, where about ten of us were discussing the consequences of this decision with Human Resources. I was the only person who spoke up. And oh my, did I speak up. I detest when big companies step on tiny employees making entry-level salaries.
Let's go back to our employee earning $40,000 per year. Each of the past two years, this employee earned $46,000. This coming year, the employee could do a great job. The employee would earn $40,000 (though some received a very small salary adjustment, maybe 1% or 2%).
You can imagine the grim looks the employees wore on their faces when we communicated this decision to them.
The harsh feelings lasted for years. Employees quit. Some became downright bitter, less productive. Some resented me. I recall one individual, tears in her eyes, faulting me for letting her down, faulting me for not doing my job, for failing her.
There are many incentives for employees. When a business matures, and grows at a standard 5% to 10% per year, bonuses give employees a first-hand understanding of the ups and downs of a mature business, as well as an incentive to drive profit increases.
Take that incentive away from an employee, and you damage a fickle relationship between employees and employer.
Two questions for you, the loyal reader.
First, should entry-level employees receive an annual bonus based on company performance?
Second, what should have been done for the $40,000 per year employee I described in this article? If a bonus is to be taken away from this employee, what (if anything) should be done for this employee?
Helping CEOs Understand How Customers Interact With Advertising, Products, Brands, and Channels
October 04, 2007
Earning A Bonus
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Many of you have forwarded articles to me outlining how your local mall is considering taking empty space and turning it into pickleball cou...
It is time to find a few smart individuals in the world of e-mail analytics and data mining! And honestly, what follows is a dataset that y...
Sometimes you think "people already know this stuff". Sometimes you realize that Google Analytics give smart analysts almost no op...
If you want to understand why clients don't trust vendors and trade journalists, read this little peach from a week ago: Direct Mail is ...
First: Not sure, but I think yes, as the reasoning you supplied is sound.ReplyDelete
Second: Seek the employees' input and offer some options (that can be supported by the business). Some possibilities could include: 1) A raise equal to some percentage of the employees average bonus for the previous X years. 2) If there is an organized review schedule for promotion, the employees review date could be moved up. 3) Priority on transfer to some other division.
Those are good ideas ... we did explore stuff like that, our compensation folks were really against (1) as they felt it would put the bonus folks at a disadvantage compared with other employees.ReplyDelete
I, of course, argued to let everybody be bonus eligible.u
Your first question- yes, entry level employees should receive a bonus structure. As they get promoted and grow with the company they should be able to move into a higher bonus bracket. It's a great way to tie individual performance to company performance. I know it makes me play close attention to our strategic initiatives and contribute to the best of my abilities.
Regarding your second question, that's a tough one. If the bonus structure is gone for good then I would look at restructuring merit incentives. You have to let the employee know that if they work hard/smart then he/she will be rewarded.
Our compensation folks weren't too excited about doing anything to help folks. We were finally able to get a few folks marginal increases (i.e. 1-3%).ReplyDelete
But for the most part, we just took something away from employees, and then had to deal with the frustration they felt.