June 26, 2023

Not Looking At It The Right Way

Here's a brand that is paying too much for Paid Social at this time ... or so it seems.


In this Marketing Budget Experiment, we increase Paid Social spend by 10% for the next year. We spend $709,000, and we don't get a whole lot in return.

  • Demand increases by $1.2 million.
  • Profit decreases by $300,000.
  • Incremental ROAS?  About 1.69. Yikes!

Every instinct you have says DON'T DO THIS!

But a funny thing happens in the future.

This brand converts 3,836 existing customers to an incremental purchase. It generates an additional 2,227 new/reactivated customers. Those customers begin doing their job ... they start paying you back.
  • $94,000 profit in the second year.
  • $100,000 profit in the third year.
  • $90,000 profit in the fourth year.
  • $84,000 profit in the fifth year.
  • A net gain of $67,000 profit across five years.

In other words, this is a good decision if you are trying to protect the long-term health of your brand.

In a digital world, with digital analytics and industry-standardized metrics like ROAS, we optimize in the short-term. We generally don't care about the future ... as an Executive once told me, "there's not a great chance I'll be there for the future anyway so why would I optimize for it?"

We optimize for it because it is the right thing to do. We're not looking at the problem the right way.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

How Much Does Productivity Need To Increase To Cover Cost Increases?

You're told that if you are more strategic, if you execute better, you will increase productivity and cover the paper / printing / posta...