When you run a Merchandise Forensics analysis (click here for the booklet), you learn that merchandise does not sell at the same rate across channels.
Each channel has a specific purpose. This purpose is not well understood by the omnichannel community.
Let's go way back to the late 1990s, at Eddie Bauer. If we were selling a shirt, we found that core sizes sold well in physical stores, while extended sizes (2XL, XLT) sold exceptionally well in catalogs and online.
Some in the omnichannel community demand that you sell the same merchandise in all channels - they tell you that the customer "demands" that you sell the same merchandise in all channels.
Others suggest that you use stores as digital distribution centers - when the 2XL size is not carried at the Northgate store in Seattle, you fulfill it from Bellevue Square.
Ignore the tactics and opinions. Follow the customer.
A well-done Merchandise Forensics project illustrates unique customer differences across channels. I routinely find that each business possesses unique behavior - behavior that is different than what you are taught when reading trade journals, research reports, different from what you learn at a conference. Merchandising data by channel tells you, rather clearly, what your channel-centric strategy should be.
Or contact me now (email@example.com) for your own, customized Merchandise Forensics project.
Here's one that comes up all the time. A brand has a category with an average price point of $30 and an average cost of goods sold of $1...
It is time to find a few smart individuals in the world of e-mail analytics and data mining! And honestly, what follows is a dataset that y...
As is my tradition, I'm going to take a long weekend. No posts until early next week. I've been doing this for almost twenty years, ...
Sometimes you think "people already know this stuff". Sometimes you realize that Google Analytics give smart analysts almost no op...