If you had to attribute events that caused the Red Cross to be here, you'd have a challenge on your hands, right? It would be easy to demonstrate that the disaster gets most of the credit.
It would be hard to show how individual contributions and corporate contributions led to this response. It would be hard to show how the actions of a Red Cross volunteer or employee led to the purchase of the vehicles, which contributed to the response.
Similarly, in catalog marketing, we have to attribute response. In the rest of the marketing world, this is called "attribution". In catalog marketing, catalogers frequently take credit for actions that should be attributed to online marketing ... as a result, the methodology is called "matchback", not "attribution".
There are many matchback vendors. Often, I'm asked to comment on the strengths and weaknesses of matchback vendors.
Instead of my opinions, let's focus on your thoughts.
In the comments section, please leave an anonymous comment. Here's what I want you to share.
- Name of the Matchback vendor you use.
- Grade you would give their services ... "A", "B", "C", "D", or "F".
- Tell us what your matchback vendor does best.
- Any additional considerations.
If you wish to put your name behind the comments, go ahead. If not, please leave an anonymous comment, and give your thoughts to the catalog community. Via the magic of search engine optimization, this can become the post that folks look to for your thoughts about matchback vendors.