Folks like to tout the importance of "engagement", don't they?
The hypothesis offered to us is that if we can get a customer to pay attention to us, the customer will spend more money with us.
Might be true.
Might not be true.
Of course, we have the data available to measure engagement, don't we?
This image shows the average conversion rate for customers who click on email campaigns "x" times per year. The image illustrates an interesting finding ... those who clicked on an email campaign the most have decreasing conversion rates.
Interesting, huh? Those who are most engage have lower conversion rates than those who are moderately engaged.
If we multiply the clicks by conversion rates, we find that those who clicked the most actually purchased the most.
So, in one graph, we are able to both prove that engagement matters, and prove that engagement is highly overrated!
Most important, I want for you to start looking at your marketing channels on an annual basis, not on a campaign basis. You can't learn the information in this chart by analyzing campaign metrics, can you?
Click here to purchase Hillstrom's Email Marketing Excellence!
Here's one for you ... the Oakland A's will not broadcast on terrestrial radio ... you can stream their radio-based games online fr...
Say you manage a paid search program. Last month you spent $100,000 and the following happened. Cost = $100,000. Clicks = 200,000. Co...
Two weeks ago I ran a poll on Twitter, asking if users calculated the profitability of their marketing efforts. 32% said "no"...
It is time to find a few smart individuals in the world of e-mail analytics and data mining! And honestly, what follows is a dataset that y...