Folks like to tout the importance of "engagement", don't they?
The hypothesis offered to us is that if we can get a customer to pay attention to us, the customer will spend more money with us.
Might be true.
Might not be true.
Of course, we have the data available to measure engagement, don't we?
This image shows the average conversion rate for customers who click on email campaigns "x" times per year. The image illustrates an interesting finding ... those who clicked on an email campaign the most have decreasing conversion rates.
Interesting, huh? Those who are most engage have lower conversion rates than those who are moderately engaged.
If we multiply the clicks by conversion rates, we find that those who clicked the most actually purchased the most.
So, in one graph, we are able to both prove that engagement matters, and prove that engagement is highly overrated!
Most important, I want for you to start looking at your marketing channels on an annual basis, not on a campaign basis. You can't learn the information in this chart by analyzing campaign metrics, can you?
Click here to purchase Hillstrom's Email Marketing Excellence!
Here's our forecast case from yesterday. If I substitute in 2,250 new items per year instead of 1,577, and if I assume that the...
Say you manage a paid search program. Last month you spent $100,000 and the following happened. Cost = $100,000. Clicks = 200,000. Co...
Two weeks ago I ran a poll on Twitter, asking if users calculated the profitability of their marketing efforts. 32% said "no"...
Yeah, that's a lousy picture. Too bad. Today is essay day. If you don't want to read something long, stop here. I spend a...