Folks like to tout the importance of "engagement", don't they?
The hypothesis offered to us is that if we can get a customer to pay attention to us, the customer will spend more money with us.
Might be true.
Might not be true.
Of course, we have the data available to measure engagement, don't we?
This image shows the average conversion rate for customers who click on email campaigns "x" times per year. The image illustrates an interesting finding ... those who clicked on an email campaign the most have decreasing conversion rates.
Interesting, huh? Those who are most engage have lower conversion rates than those who are moderately engaged.
If we multiply the clicks by conversion rates, we find that those who clicked the most actually purchased the most.
So, in one graph, we are able to both prove that engagement matters, and prove that engagement is highly overrated!
Most important, I want for you to start looking at your marketing channels on an annual basis, not on a campaign basis. You can't learn the information in this chart by analyzing campaign metrics, can you?
Click here to purchase Hillstrom's Email Marketing Excellence!
Yesterday we talked about the fact that best catalog customers (a minority of your file) deserve MANY catalogs that are merchandised with...
Look at the first four rows of our life table (values of 0/1/2/3). These are the first 12-15 weeks after a customer buys for the firs...
In our simulation, we learn that there are different definitions of Carrying Capacity. If the CFO demands that we maximize profit o...
You probably run Life Tables for your customer file, right? Right? They've been around forever ( click here for a reference f...